Caroline Lucas, Green candidate for Brighton Pavilion, explains why she is against the Digital Economy Act’s provisions to disconnect families for copyright infringement.
Every competent business owner these days knows that it’s essential to have some kind of presence on the Internet. The question that faces every company when deciding on a web site is how to operate the site without having to invest thousands in computer equipment and technical staff. That’s when managed hosting can be of great benefit to small- and medium-sized businesses.
Many business owners and managers might be surprised to find that the first question to ask isn’t about finding a web hosting service, but about the web site itself. In other words, what exactly does the company want its web site to do? A business web site could act like a billboard, simply giving information about what the business does and where to find it. Or it could be a full-blown online business, not only offering goods and services but using social networking tools to develop a customer community around its specialty. Deciding what the web site should do and be is the critical first step.
Web developers help businesses decide about the functions of their web sites, and then create the web sites according to those specifications. After the website is designed, however, it still must be regularly monitored for performance, updated with new information and upgraded when necessary. This takes a lot of an employee’s time that some businesses would prefer to be spent elsewhere. At that point, managed hosting becomes an attractive alternative.
Just as with deciding a web site’s purpose, there’s a fundamental rule to selecting web hosting: “Cheap” isn’t necessary “best.” This is particularly true of managed hosting, which often calls for a higher level of technical skill and equipment than many low-level services can provide. The way to determine how well a web hosting service can fill a business’ needs is to evaluate the service by four key qualifications: technical support, reliability, data transfer rate and data storage. These last three qualities are more commonly known as uptime, bandwidth and disk space.
Often hosting vendors will promote their services, especially disk space and bandwidth, as “unlimited.” Business people in particularly know that no resource is ever “unlimited, ” so it pays to know how to ask about specifics for each qualification. The web site’s design can help by providing a business with standards for site, especially in terms of disk space and bandwidth. In addition, businesses should ask about the hosting service’s reliability, or “uptime, ” which often is expressed as a percentage such as 99.9 percent.
With managed hosting, technical support may not be as crucial an issue, since technical support usually serves businesses that maintain their own sites. However, this is not a quality to be overlooked, because it reflects the web host’s dedication to customer service, which also impacts managed hosting.
If a web hosting client meets the basic qualifications, then it’s time to take a close look at its managed hosting options. These typically come in two forms: Dedicated Server, in which a business leases a computer for its exclusive use, and Virtual Private Server, in which a business leases a portion of computer that acts like an exclusive piece of equipment. Choosing one of these options again boils down to how large and complicated the web site functions are.
In either case, the managed hosting aspect should be the same. The web hosting service contracts with the business to handle all of the administration of its web site. This arrangement frees the business from the expense of buying equipment and hiring staff at the same time it assures a continual, reliable Internet presence.
Article Source: Articles Engine
Need help finding people to follow?
Follow Finder analyses public social graph information (following and follower lists) on Twitter to find people you might want to follow
Follow Finder generates two lists based on the public social connections on Twitter (follower and following lists):
Give it a try here…
A letter to the Financial Times, signed by Tom Watson, MP, Stephen Fry and technology industry leaders:
Sir, We regret that the House of Lords adopted amendment 120A to the digital economy bill (“Bill will censor internet, providers claim”, March 6). This amendment not only significantly changes the injunctions procedure in the UK but will lead to an increase in internet service providers blocking websites accused of illegally hosting copyrighted material without cases even reaching a judge. The amendment seeks to address the legitimate concerns of rights-holders but would have unintended consequences that far outweigh any benefits it could bring.
Endorsing a policy that would encourage the blocking of websites by UK broadband providers or other internet companies is a very serious step for the UK to take. There are myriad legal, technical and practical issues to reconcile before this can be considered a proportionate and necessary public policy option. In some cases, these may never be reconciled. These issues have not even been considered in this case.
The Lords have been thoughtful in their consideration of the bill to date. It is therefore bitterly disappointing that the House has allowed an amendment with obvious shortcomings to proceed without challenging its proponents to consider and address the full consequences. Put simply, blocking access as envisaged by this clause would both widely disrupt the internet in the UK and elsewhere and threaten freedom of speech and the open internet, without reducing copyright infringement as intended. To rush through such a controversial proposal at the tail end of a parliament, without any kind of consultation with consumers or industry, is very poor lawmaking.
We are particularly concerned that a measure of this kind as a general purpose policy could have an adverse impact on the reputation of the UK as a place to do online business and conflict with the broader objectives of Digital Britain. This debate has created tension between specific interest groups and the bigger prize of promoting a policy framework that supports our digital economy and appropriately balances rights and responsibilities. All parties should take steps to safeguard this prize and place it at the heart of public policy in this area.
Tom Alexander,
Chief Executive, Orange
Richard Allan,
Director of Policy EU, Facebook
Neil Berkett,
Chief Executive, Virgin Media
Matt Brittin,
Managing Director, Google UK and Ireland
Charles Dunstone,
Chairman, Talk Talk Group
Stephen Fry
Jessica Hendrie-Liaño,
Chair, Internet Services Providers Association
Jill Johnstone,
International Director, Consumer Focus
Jim Killock,
Executive Director, Open Rights Group
Mark Lewis,
Managing Director, eBay UK
Ian Livingston,
Chief Executive, BT Group
Sarah Oates,
University of Glasgow
Jenny Pickerill,
University of Leicester
Mark Rabe,
Managing Director, Yahoo! UK and Ireland
Paul Reilly,
University of Leicester
Jess Search,
Founder, Shooting People independent film makers
Ian Walden,
Queen Mary, University of London
Tom Watson, MP

Paypal have today released a new version of its iPhone app.
As well as having a snazzy new animated splash screen, it included one feature that was sorely missing from its previous version.
It now allows you to send a money request to your contacts (yippee!)
PayPal has offered a free application for the iPhone ever since the App Store launched in mid-2008, and it has gradually been improving over time.
The other significant new features are the ability to withdraw money from Paypal and deposit in into your bank account.
It also has some nifty integration with Bump which enables you to exchange money with other iPhone users simply by tapping the two phones together ! !
This surely is the stuff that dreams are made of…!

Does this spell the end for cash ?
I hope so, that would be nice wouldn’t it !
Although it would require everyone that you knew to have an iPhone… but your mates could never dibb out on paying for a round !
I’ve been using Google’s Chrome browser for a few weeks now and I’m slowly falling in love with it…
Before that I had always been a Firefox devotee.
But like a lot of users I found Firefox’s memory hogging inclinations to a bit distracting at times!
In fact that was one of the main reasons I started using Chrome.
As time goes on I am finding more and more thing to like about it, especially now that extensions are available for the Mac Beta!
However a really nice feature of Chrome is the ability to resize text input boxes on the fly (see the video below).
This is a really simple yet really nice bit of usability, one of those nice little touches that go a long way!
Are you using Google Chrome ?
Which feature do you like the most ?
Evernote have just released an awesome new feature whereby you can search all your notes direct from the Google Chrome Address bar.
For those of you that haven’t heard of it, Evernote is a fantastic app that allows you to capture lots of information in notes that can be synchronised across multiple devices/computers.
You can access these notes direct from the software on your computer, or via the web or even via your mobile device.
It’s really good and I’ve come to depend on it.
And now:
“Google Chrome’s address bar doubles as a search bar, which makes it really easy to search various sites without actually going to them first. Now, you can add Evernote as a search engine in Google Chrome and search your notes from anywhere. Here’s how to set it up:
Go to the Preferences (Mac) or Tools (Windows) menu
Click on the Manage button in the Default Search section
Click to add a new search engine
Type the following:Name: Evernote
Keyword: Evernote.com
URL: http://www.evernote.com/search?q=%s”
And here’s a litte video to help you more:
Very nice Evernote, you just keep getting better and better!
Firefox 3.6 is out of the bag…
Main features in the new verions are:
Get it now…